Measure residue cover to protect the soil

Keyword:
Publish time: 1st November, 2014      Source: Michigan State University Extension
Information collection and data processing:  CCM     For more information, please contact us
     

Maintaining a minimum amount of crop residue on the soil surface guards against erosion and builds healthy soil.

    

Posted on October 30, 2014 by James DeDecker, Michigan State University Extension

        

Crop residue, or stover, includes leaf and stalk tissues of field crops that have traditionally been returned to the soil as an important source of organic matter and plant nutrients. Since the Dust Bowl of the1930s, crop residue cover left at the soil surface by minimizing tillage has also been recognized as a key erosion control tool. Yet, current trends in field crop production systems are encouraging some producers to harvest more stover for use as bedding, forage and even bioenergy feedstock.

Higher average biomass yields, reduced tillage and new demand from the livestock and energy sectors are fundamental factors creating site-specific opportunities for profitable stover harvest. Growers with multiple years of no-till corn in rotation may even see modest yield benefits from removing residue that can otherwise inhibit soil warming and planting. Still, it is important to remember that removing too much crop residue from a field has the potential to increase risks of wind and water erosion and negatively impact soil organic matter concentrations. Maintaining a base level of surface cover and returning enough stover to maintain long-term soil organic matter pools should be paramount in residue management decisions. Estimating the amount of residue cover remaining in a field after tillage or planting is an easy way to strike an appropriate balance.

The line transect method generates an accurate estimation of residue cover using one simple tool, a measuring tape or marked rope. The line can be 100 feet long marked or knotted at one foot intervals or 50 feet long marked every 6 inches. In the field, the line is stretched diagonally to crop rows and each end anchored in place. Residue cover is evaluated at each marked point along the line to calculate a simple percent cover measure (X/100). A point can be counted if it is directly over crop residue, cover crop tissue, weeds, animal bedding or anything else likely to absorb the impact of a 3/32-inch raindrop. Observations must be made from a consistent perspective, walking along one side of the line and looking straight down at each recording point. Some find it helpful to count using a 3/32-inch diameter dowel to simulate the path of a raindrop. Calculating the mean of five separate cover measures taken at representative sites dispersed throughout a field provides an acceptable overall estimation.

The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) conservation compliance standard of at least 30 percent residue cover remaining immediately after planting is a general goal to shoot for, but strict no-till systems can maintain as much as 60 percent cover from corn and 40 percent from soybeans. Achieving the “perfect” amount of cover is difficult and dependent on the specifics of tillage and planting operations as well as environmental conditions. Fortunately, tools are available to estimate the impact of various field operations on residue cover and also the amount of stover that could be removed without compromising the soil.

The table below shows the average impact of tillage and planting implements on residue cover. If line transect measures are completed in the fall, cover remaining at planting can be estimated by multiplying the fall cover by each accumulative factor associated with subsequent operations (see example). Michigan State University Extension recommends higher estimation values should be used for corn and small grain residue and lower values for more fragile residue such as soybean stover. Residue cover can also be measured directly after planting in the spring.

Residue cover remaining after various field operations.

Guide to estimated percentage of soil covered by crop residue after field operations. Predict the effect your till/plant system will have on crop residues by multiplying the percentages for each operation you use. There are broad ranges. Speed, depth and soil moisture can affect the amount of residue left.

Tillage operation

Corn/small grain

Soybeans

After harvest

90-95

60-80

Over-winter decomposition

80-95

70-80

Moldboard plow

0-10

0-5

Paraplow

80-90

75-85

Combination secondary tillage tool

50-75

30-60

Chisel (twisted points)

50-70

30-40

Chisel (straight points)

60-80

40-60

Disk (off-set, primary < 9-inch space)

40-70

25-40

Disk (tandem, finishing 7-9-inch spacing)

30-60

20-40

Anhydrous applicator

75-85

45-70

Field cultivator (as secondary operation)

60-90

35-75

Row planter

85-95

75-95

No-till drill

55-75

40-60

 

Here is an example of how to estimate how much residue cover will be left after each tillage operation.

95% (after corn harvest) x 90% (after winter) x 70% (spring chisel straight points) x 45% (spring disk tandem) x 85% (planting) = 23% (residue cover after planting)

Source: USDA NRCS, 1992, “Farming with Crops Residues”

Another handy tool, the Lucas Soil Organic Matter Calculator available online through The Ohio state University South Centers, is a spreadsheet based calculator that uses baseline soil data and information regarding production practices like residue removal, tillage, manure and cover crop use to predict soil organic matter dynamics. With this basic information, growers can target specific stover removal and residue cover rates appropriate for their unique cropping systems. Line-transect and crop biomass measurements are then simple ways to confirm the short-term results of these efforts. When complimented by soil health monitoring using emerging analysis techniques, the tools available provide an unprecedented and comprehensive soil health management package for field crop producers.

References

  

This article was published by Michigan State University Extension. For more information, visit http://www.cnchemicals.com/. To have a digest of information delivered straight to your email inbox, visit http://bit.ly/MSUENews. To contact an expert in your area, visit http://www.cnchemicals.com/, or call 888-MSUE4MI (888-678-3464).

    

Related Articles

      
  •     

    East Central Michigan field crop regional report – June 19, 2014

        

    June 19, 2014 | Dan Rossman | Crops are off to a slow but good start. Recent rains have prevented ample moisture.

      
  •        
  •     

    Resources available for reducing impacts of the 2014 cool, wet spring and planting delays

        

    May 19, 2014 | Mike Staton | During spring 2014, weather-related planting delays created serious challenges for field crop producers throughout Michigan. Resources are available to help farmers address the challenges of a cool, wet spring and delayed planting.

      
  •        
  •     

    East Central Michigan field crop regional report – May 15, 2014

        

    May 15, 2014 | Dan Rossman | Wet, soggy field conditions continue to keep field work at a standstill.

      
  •        
  •     

    Winter weather update for 2013-2014

        

    March 7, 2014 | Jeff Andresen | While milder weather and some moderation are expected in the short term, medium and longer lead forecast guidance suggests a general continuation of colder than normal temperatures.

      
  •        
  •     

    Integrated pest management can save money

        

    January 22, 2014 | Marilyn Thelen | Looking for ways to save money on pest management? Review the integrated pest management (IPM) program on your farm to see that it is being utilized to the fullest.

      
  •